The Bible is like a music archive. It contains laments, military marches, love songs, prayers, courtly hymns, the voices of the exiled. Try to perform them all at once: the trumpets will drown out the lullaby, the victors will shout down the mourners. You’d have to hunt for the music like a needle in a haystack.
Ten correctly quoted verses do not yet make a melody. You can stitch them into a flawless argument from which mercy, trust and love have vanished. Everything is proven, and it is frightening to stand next to the one who proved it. The marks on the page have been read correctly. But has the person heard what they were written for?
A person chooses judgment, punishment and fidelity, combines them—and becomes suspicious, merciless, ready to coerce. He can defend every note with a citation. Love is listed on the orchestra roster too, but its microphone is off. The error hides in the connections and the accents: one phrase is made deafening, another is allowed only to whisper. The result is a musical piece you cannot listen to.
C–E–G — the C‑major triad: four semitones, then three. Raise the G by a semitone and you get an augmented triad, four plus four. The chord is complete, but if C major was required, something else has been played. One note reshapes the whole. So in biblical commentaries, justice, quietly replaced by revenge, changes the way all the neighboring words sound.
Beauty by itself does not save. A magnificent march can lead people to seize another’s home. A sublime song can glorify the superiority of one people. A dangerous idea may have a splendid voice; it is that voice that gets it past the guards. Therefore spiritual harmony should be sought in the concord of beauty, love, truth and strength.
Love gives direction to strength, truth gives depth to beauty, and strength enables love to act. Together these qualities keep one another from becoming caricatures. It is hard for us to play them simultaneously: in pursuing justice we stop forgiving; in displaying strength we lose tenderness. There is a fullness in Jesus’ melody that we are still learning to hear.
In Tolkien’s “Music of the Ainur” the Creator proposes the theme, the spiritual beings develop it, and Melkor introduces discord. Each knows only a part of the vast design. Sometimes a person defends God so loudly that God’s voice can no longer be heard.
“Having ears, they do not hear, and do not understand,” says Jesus, linking misunderstanding to a hardened heart. Spiritual deafness also masters the quotations. But for the Divine melody a person needs hearing that cannot be replaced by volume. Sometimes—no one knows how—we recognize the harmony before we can explain it. Beside someone, for the first time, it becomes easier to breathe. The soul sings.
“He who desires to do His will shall know concerning the teaching…” If someone loves music, they play it every day. If someone reaches for God, they constantly rehearse the Divine harmony in heart and mind in order to embody it in life. Yet one can diligently play from incorrectly placed notes, carry out instruction and produce terrible music. Practice deepens understanding when the performer listens to the result and is able to change their playing.
Systematic theology classifies the notes, explains the chords, brings concepts into order. But you can write a study of the guitar without ever having played the song. The text is the score, theology is the analysis of the composition, and life is the performance. Internal coherence of a scheme does not mean the music has sounded. Even if it has sounded, listeners sometimes flee from it.
The chief surprise awaits the musician himself: identical chords admit entirely different melodies. God, humanity, freedom, love, salvation can all be present in different doctrines. But what story does the voice tell? Does it lead to trust, keep people in fear, help us see our neighbor? The chords are familiar, but the song has turned out different.
Jesus’ melody is still too hard: to love an enemy, to forgive, to renounce superiority. Its beauty is revealed in what the performer becomes. An imprecise grasp of the notes can preserve the spirit of the whole better than a precise interpretation that breeds cruelty. The possibility of error is a condition of inquiry. For fear of striking a false note one might never pick up the instrument.
You cannot reconstruct Jesus’ melody from theological chords alone. You must listen to the voice itself—in the words, the deeds, and the relation between them. Constant practice is required. Only then should you choose the accompaniment that allows this melody to sound. And even so, however close we come to Jesus, it will be our interpretation of His song. But still—we are drawing closer to Him!
Leave a Reply