If all of Jesus’ words are treated as if they were on the same level, a strange picture emerges. Imagine a person who only yesterday came to believe in God and today opens the Sermon on the Mount and learns that he must love his enemies, not worry, not resist evil and be perfect as the Heavenly Father is. What will he feel? The joy of the Good News or terror at an exam he can never pass? Doesn’t it turn out that you must first become almost perfect — and only then will God agree to accept you?
But Jesus’ words are addressed to different people and spoken in different situations. “Believe God” and “do not take two tunics” cannot automatically be turned into requirements of the same order. Did Jesus tell every passerby, “Leave your job, family and possessions and become a wandering preacher”? No. We must distinguish the core of the Gospel, the demands of spiritual growth, and special instructions to messengers. That is why it is dangerous to turn the Sermon on the Mount into a checklist of conditions for salvation. Rather, we are looking at a portrait of a mature person of the Kingdom.
No one goes up to a young apple tree in spring and asks, “Where are your apples?” Life appears first: roots go down into the ground, branches grow, and only then do the fruits come. That is the natural sequence of any development: cause precedes result. Why should spiritual life be arranged the other way around? Perhaps we are making a simple logical error when we turn the fruits of spiritual development into conditions for its beginning.
A different sequence is visible in Jesus’ teaching. First a person accepts God as Father and realizes himself as His child. Then a deeper process begins, which the Gospel describes as being born of the Spirit. From the new inner life an appropriate character gradually develops. Faith, sonship and the choice of God’s will are at the root of the tree; mercy, selflessness, love for enemies and spiritual steadfastness are among its mature fruits.
Psychology knows a similar process. A change in deep identity gradually alters behavior. A person who has truly experienced himself as loved and accepted begins to relate to himself and to others differently. So “God is my Father” can be taken not only as a theological formula but as a new basic identity. If God is truly Father, who do I become? And what begins to happen to the person who builds life on that basis?
Jesus calls the inner change even more radically “being born of the Spirit.” A modern person might use other words: awakening, a shift in consciousness, inner transformation. The language differs, but the idea remains: spiritual life cannot be reduced to observing external rules. The change must happen inside the person. New behavior then does not get put on from the outside like a religious uniform, but gradually grows out of a changed inner source.
Something special happened with the apostles. Jesus chose a small group of people and for several years intensely reshaped their worldview. He changed their attitudes and values, sent them out to act on their own, allowed them to make mistakes and taught them again. It resembles an accelerated transformation of personality and the training of future instructors. Should the requirements for someone who has just entered the school be the same as for someone being trained to become a teacher?
Thus the words “you are the salt of the earth” and “you are the light of the world” had a particular force in their immediate context: before Jesus stood the future representatives of the Kingdom. All the more specific are the instructions about how they should travel, preach and manage resources. Yet the principle of light itself is universal. Anyone in whom the life of the Kingdom is developing gradually becomes a light to those around them. We cannot demand of a beginning spiritual life all the qualities of its mature state.
Imagine a newborn child. He cries, demands attention, can do nothing and in character is nothing like his father. But does the father say, “First become reasonable, kind and independent, and then I will acknowledge you as my son”? Everything is the other way around. First the child is a son, and then years of growth begin. Sonship is not a reward for maturity. Maturity becomes the task precisely because sonship already exists.
From this comes the main question: where is the minimum after which a person has already entered into saving relationship with God, even though his character is still far from the ideal of Jesus? If this point is set too high, the Gospel quietly turns into a system of spiritual achievements. But Jesus begins with faith, trust and the human response to God. Perhaps the saving point comes much earlier than moral perfection — where the human will for the first time sincerely says “yes” to God.
A person can choose a road and still be very poor at walking it. He can stumble, stop, and even move backward for a while. But is there not a difference between someone who is slowly walking north and someone who has chosen south? Direction must not be confused with distance travelled. We often judge ourselves by how far we are from the ideal, even though another question is no less important: where am I heading at all?
Then salvation can be understood not only as a one-time legal status acquired, but as an ongoing free relationship between the person and God. The question “Am I saved?” acquires another dimension: “Do I want now to live with God and to become like Him?” A person is not required to prove in advance that he will never change his mind. Free relationships exist precisely because the person continues freely to choose them.
Therefore a person can sincerely accept the Gospel and remain irritable, selfish, cowardly and insufficiently forgiving. Does that mean he is outside the Kingdom? Then you would have to set a passing score: how merciful must one become — 40 percent, 70 or 95? How many more times is one allowed not to forgive? Jesus leaves no such scale. His family metaphor offers a different model: sonship precedes likeness to the Father, and likeness becomes the task of growth.
Finally there is a historical question. Jesus preached the Gospel of the Kingdom long before the cross. What then did He call the Gospel? The Gospel already existed; the Kingdom was proclaimed; people were called to believe and enter it. So the original content of the Good News must be sought first of all in what Jesus actually proclaimed in his lifetime: God is Father, a person can respond to Him in faith, enter into relations of sonship and choose to do His will.
Different people will name what happens in different ways. A Christian will call it being born from above; a psychologist, a transformation of personality; a philosopher, a change in the direction of the will; a spiritual seeker, an awakening; and a researcher will see a process in which cause gradually produces the effect. The words differ. The question remains the same: what appears first — moral perfection or a new inner life?
Perhaps here lies one of the most joyful ideas of Jesus’ Gospel. God does not stand at the end of the road, waiting for a person finally to become good enough. He meets him at the beginning of the journey. So the main question is not “Have I become good enough for God to accept me?” but “Do I choose God as my Father, and do I want to go to Him?” The tree first lives, then bears fruit. The child first becomes a son, then grows up. Perhaps spiritual life begins the same way: first a person says his free “yes” to God, and then the long journey of transformation begins.
Leave a comment